Former Hull City chairman hits back over Adam Pearson attack

• Paul Duffen defends his record at the KC Stadium
• Current chairman had attacked ‘poor business sense’

The former Hull City chairman Paul Duffen has responded to criticism of his KC Stadium tenure from his successor Adam Pearson. Pearson used his programme notes ahead of last night’s 2-0 defeat to Aston Villa to attack Duffen, who resigned in October, allowing Pearson to return to the role he had held between 2001 and 2007.

“In my personal opinion, the decisions made by Mr Duffen were extremely short-sighted and lacking in business sense and specific football knowledge,” Pearson wrote. “He seems, albeit with the advantage of hindsight, to have had no understanding of the industry, Hull City AFC or the city of Hull itself.”

He went on to accuse Duffen, who led Hull into the Premier League, of “poor business sense” and a “lack of moral responsibility” while describing the money spent on agents as “morally abhorrent”.

With Hull looking set for relegation after two seasons in the top flight, there are concerns the club may be forced into administration. Duffen, though, said Hull have “one of the lowest squad wage bills in the Premier League and amongst the lowest levels of debt”.

He added: “The successes were not achieved through financial muscle but through partnerships, ambition, team spirit, collective positive attitude and a stubborn refusal to fail. I firmly believe that if those qualities remain at the club then Hull City have every chance of playing a third season in the Premier League and I wish them well.”

Hull CityPremier Leagueguardian.co.uk

Hull and Arsenal fined by FA over pre-Christmas fracas

• Hit with £40,000 and £20,000 sanctions respectively
• Hull settle legal dispute with former chairman Duffen

Hull have been fined £40,000 and Arsenal £20,000 for failing to control their players during their league match on 19 December. The bad-tempered encounter, which Arsenal won 3-0, erupted shortly before half-time when Samir Nasri appeared to tread on the ankle of Hull’s Richard Garcia.

Stephen Hunt then clashed with Nasri and a mass confrontation took place in front of referee Steve Bennett, with Arsenal goalkeeper Manuel Almunia sprinting 100 yards to get involved.

Players from both sides became embroiled in ugly scenes with Bennett eventually booking Hunt and Nasri.

“At a regulatory commission hearing this week, Arsenal and Hull City were fined for failing to control their players during a match at the Emirates Stadium in December,” read a statement from the Football Association. “The clubs were charged in relation to a mass confrontation between players from both sides during the fixture on 19 December. Hull admitted the charge. Arsenal denied the charge but the commission found it proved.

“Both clubs have also been warned as to their future conduct.”

Meanwhile, Hull have settled their legal dispute with former chairman Paul Duffen out of court. The club began proceedings against Duffen last month after accusing him of spending company money for private use during his time in charge.

Hull also alleged Duffen’s company received payments from agents in return for allowing those same agents to negotiate transfers on the club’s behalf.

A statement read: “Further to a statement made on 22 January 2010 regarding legal action commenced by Hull City against its former chief executive officer, we are pleased to confirm that we have agreed settlement on terms satisfactory to the club.

“This agreement brings to an end all disputes between the parties.”

Duffen resigned from his position as executive chairman last October, soon after the publication of an alarming set of financial results. He was succeeded by his predecessor Adam Pearson.

Hull CityArsenalguardian.co.uk

Hull take legal action to force former chairman to pay back ‘bungs’

• Club claim Paul Duffen breached duty as director
• Allegations that agents paid for business deals

Hull City today accused the club’s former chairman Paul Duffen in the high court of personally accepting “bungs” from agents in return for making sure the club did business deals with those agents.

That claim was made in a court action in which Hull are suing Duffen for damages, for the alleged bung money to be paid to the club, and for the return of money and property they claim Duffen “acquired” for himself while he was a director. Duffen accepted that a legal charge be placed on a property he owns, in favour of the club, to secure the money claimed, although he denied all the allegations made against him.

In their claim to the court, City allege that agents, who are not named, paid bungs to Duffen via Reef Securities, a company registered in the Bahamas with an office in Guernsey.

“In breach of his employment contracts and fiduciary duties to [the club] as … director,” the claim states, “certain monies were paid by third-party football agents to [Reef Securities] on [Paul Duffen's] behalf, in return for which [Duffen] procured that [the club] contract with the agents for business.”

The claim also alleges that Duffen: “Used [the club's] monies for his own personal expenditure”, and that “property, monies and other rights [were] acquired by [Duffen] through his use of [the club's] money in breach of authority and breach of trust”.

A further allegation is that Duffen “was very frequently absent from the stadium, which was his designated place of work” while he was the chairman.

The document states that Duffen did not simply resign as a director on 26 ­October last year, as announced at the time, but that his resignation followed “his suspension”.

This court action, thought to be the first by any English football club alleging that one of their employees or directors have accepted bungs, follows the turmoil in the autumn when Duffen resigned. The club’s accounts, filed ­several months late, included a statement from the ­auditors that Hull had to find £16m additional funding within a year if they survive in the Premier League, and £23m if they are ­relegated. The accountants warned: “These matters represent a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt over the company’s ability to ­continue as a going concern.”

The former chairman Adam Pearson returned to the KC Stadium, having been appointed as chairman by City’s owner, the Essex-based property investor ­Russell Bartlett, and immediately appointed accountants to undertake a thorough investigation of the club’s financial affairs. The new chairman warned that the wage bill had risen far too high and too many players had been signed under Duffen’s period in charge, during which Hull had won their promotion to the Premier League in 2008 and survived in the top flight last season.

In December, Pearson said Hull had ­contracts committing them to paying agents “over £4.5m” during a 12-month period. It was, however, not known until yesterday that City had instigated proceedings against Duffen, accusing him of taking bungs from agents and using club money for himself and to acquire property.

Duffen denied all the claims, with his barrister, Lexa Hilliard, saying that the agreement for him to have a charge over his property “is not to be taken in any way at all as an admission by Mr Duffen of any of the allegations made against him”.

Duffen has claimed that Hull owe him money for the early termination of his contract as the club’s chairman, although the club denied that any legal proceedings had been issued.

City’s lawyer, Clive Zietman, of the firm Stewarts Law, said: “The club will be ­vigorously pursuing this claim.”

Duffen is required to file his defence next month.

Hull CityBusinessDavid Connguardian.co.uk